Mar. 8th, 2005

clodia_risa: (Default)
Today, at the National Defense University, the President said that "terrorists are less likely to endanger our security if they are worried about their own security." (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050308-3.html)

I've been wondering about this. At first, it seems true - if we have the terrorist so much on the run, then they won't have the time or energy to come after us. But I've been thinking. Isn't their lack of security, or at least feeling as if they have no security the entire reason that the terrorists attacked and continue to attack the US/US forces? Don't they feel insecure due to the U.S., and so started this whole thing? And in Iraq, how successful have we been in stopping the insurgents, even as they feel more and more insecure? Wasn't the week of the elections fairly bloody, as "democracy" started to take flight (or whatnot)?

So, will making our enemies, the terrorist, more insecure cause them to stop these attacks, or will their fear make them continue?

EDIT:
The President continued: "When terrorists spend their days struggling to avoid death or capture, they are less capable of arming and training to commit new attacks. We will keep the terrorists on the run, until they have nowhere left to hide."

But isn't the tactics of the terrorist guerilla? They hit and run...so they're already running. And how much training does it take to set off a bomb?

Profile

clodia_risa: (Default)
clodia_risa

September 2010

S M T W T F S
    1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 18th, 2026 12:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios